<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Recipe For Disaster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joetaxpayer.com/a-recipe-for-disaster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joetaxpayer.com/a-recipe-for-disaster/</link>
	<description>Financial Commentary For The Average Joe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:56:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JAL</title>
		<link>http://www.joetaxpayer.com/a-recipe-for-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>JAL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 16:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.joetaxpayer.com/?p=161#comment-274</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe,</p>
<p>Good post!</p>
<p>I recently read a comment on an Internet forum where a driver of a large diesel pickup said he would *not* pay $6.00 per gallon for diesel!  I thought to myself: &#8220;Yes you will&#8230; and you&#8217;ll also pay $7.00, $8.00, $9.00&#8230; and someday even $20.00 or more per gallon&#8230; unless you want to walk, ride a bike, or ride a horse.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;ll going to take some punitively high fuel prices to force us into &#8220;de-evolving&#8221; from our current carbon-based-fuel dependent society.  $5.00 and $6.00 fuel prices aren&#8217;t going to do it.  They&#8217;re helping to wake everyone up, but not nearly painful enough.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;ll bet $20.00 per gallon fuel (at today&#8217;s money value) would spur on a lot of quick innovation and change!</p>
<p>The following excerpt is from a weekly e-newsletter I receive from an energy supplier:</p>
<p>Looking ahead: What if the future of nuclear energy had a fuel that produced 70% less waste and nothing that you could use to make a bomb? That’s what Moscow’s Thorium Power is striving to produce. Thorium Power, operating since the mid-90s, when it was partially funded by the US Department of Energy as a way of keeping former Soviet nuclear scientists occupied, is testing a new fuel based on the chemical element thorium. Thorium is between 3 and 4 times more abundant in nature than uranium.  The difference comes in the family of radioactive elements and isotopes that are created from its use in a reactor, with the key being the absence of weapons grade plutonium. Instead, thorium breaks down into several unstable uranium isotopes. In a test reactor, thorium has achieved a yield of 100MW days per kg of fuel, which compares with an average of about 60MW days in most uranium-run reactors meaning it can run a reactor up to 9 years as opposed to 3 for uranium fuel. As well as being more efficient, it produces 70% less waste.</p>
<p>Best regards,</p>
<p>JAL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

