<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FDIC Scare You?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joetaxpayer.com/fdic-scare-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joetaxpayer.com/fdic-scare-you/</link>
	<description>Financial Commentary For The Average Joe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:56:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Surprise! Your Bank Closed! &#8211; My Experience With The FDIC &#124; Personal Finance Firewall</title>
		<link>http://www.joetaxpayer.com/fdic-scare-you/comment-page-1/#comment-22215</link>
		<dc:creator>Surprise! Your Bank Closed! &#8211; My Experience With The FDIC &#124; Personal Finance Firewall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.joetaxpayer.com/?p=191#comment-22215</guid>
		<description>[...] didn&#8217;t buy that. To be honest, I was pretty nervous about this. Due to a steady decrease in interest rate, I had been planning to abandon ship anyway [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] didn&#8217;t buy that. To be honest, I was pretty nervous about this. Due to a steady decrease in interest rate, I had been planning to abandon ship anyway [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JOE</title>
		<link>http://www.joetaxpayer.com/fdic-scare-you/comment-page-1/#comment-688</link>
		<dc:creator>JOE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.joetaxpayer.com/?p=191#comment-688</guid>
		<description>Again, thanks for writing. I was trying to keep the post itself on the brief side, and provided a link to the FDIC for more details. (This is what I get for not prepping my August main article before month&#039;s end. A couple sub-par blog posts.)
Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, thanks for writing. I was trying to keep the post itself on the brief side, and provided a link to the FDIC for more details. (This is what I get for not prepping my August main article before month&#8217;s end. A couple sub-par blog posts.)<br />
Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JAL</title>
		<link>http://www.joetaxpayer.com/fdic-scare-you/comment-page-1/#comment-686</link>
		<dc:creator>JAL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.joetaxpayer.com/?p=191#comment-686</guid>
		<description>Hi Joe,

As you probably already know, saying that accounts are insured by the FDIC up to $100K is only partially true.  Unfortunately it&#039;s a bit more complicated than that.

Certain account types are grouped together at an insured bank (checking, savings, CD&#039;s in one group, then IRA&#039;s in another) and each single account owner is then insured up to $100,000 for the checking/savings/CD types accounts, and up to $250,000 for the IRA type accounts.

Jointly held accounts are split proportionally amongst the account owners to determine coverage limits.  For example, a single $200,000 savings account owned by a husband and wife would be fully insured (assuming no other accounts are held at the same bank) because each owner is insured up to $100,000 in that account type.

It&#039;s also interesting to note that an estate IRA (an IRA held in the name of a deceased person payable to a beneficiary) is insured under the decedent&#039;s name and thus isn&#039;t grouped in with the beneficiary&#039;s bank accounts to determine coverage.

A visit to the FDIC&#039;s insurance handy electronic coverage calculator will help you figure out exactly where you stand:

http://www.fdic.gov/edie/

Best regards,

John L.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Joe,</p>
<p>As you probably already know, saying that accounts are insured by the FDIC up to $100K is only partially true.  Unfortunately it&#8217;s a bit more complicated than that.</p>
<p>Certain account types are grouped together at an insured bank (checking, savings, CD&#8217;s in one group, then IRA&#8217;s in another) and each single account owner is then insured up to $100,000 for the checking/savings/CD types accounts, and up to $250,000 for the IRA type accounts.</p>
<p>Jointly held accounts are split proportionally amongst the account owners to determine coverage limits.  For example, a single $200,000 savings account owned by a husband and wife would be fully insured (assuming no other accounts are held at the same bank) because each owner is insured up to $100,000 in that account type.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also interesting to note that an estate IRA (an IRA held in the name of a deceased person payable to a beneficiary) is insured under the decedent&#8217;s name and thus isn&#8217;t grouped in with the beneficiary&#8217;s bank accounts to determine coverage.</p>
<p>A visit to the FDIC&#8217;s insurance handy electronic coverage calculator will help you figure out exactly where you stand:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fdic.gov/edie/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fdic.gov/edie/</a></p>
<p>Best regards,</p>
<p>John L.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

