<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The State of Healthcare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joetaxpayer.com/healthcare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joetaxpayer.com/healthcare/</link>
	<description>Financial Commentary For The Average Joe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:56:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elle</title>
		<link>http://www.joetaxpayer.com/healthcare/comment-page-1/#comment-8446</link>
		<dc:creator>Elle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joetaxpayer.com/?p=1825#comment-8446</guid>
		<description>Bobo, did you read the New Yorker article? It is not about prescribing medications. It is about doctors ordering unnecessary procedures because they have a financial interest in the profits of the facilities doing the procedures. This practice is legal.

As for single payer vs. the multi-layered, multi-horizontal current system, I think only a biased party would assert that the current system is cheaper than single payer. The math is undeniable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bobo, did you read the New Yorker article? It is not about prescribing medications. It is about doctors ordering unnecessary procedures because they have a financial interest in the profits of the facilities doing the procedures. This practice is legal.</p>
<p>As for single payer vs. the multi-layered, multi-horizontal current system, I think only a biased party would assert that the current system is cheaper than single payer. The math is undeniable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The BoBo</title>
		<link>http://www.joetaxpayer.com/healthcare/comment-page-1/#comment-8434</link>
		<dc:creator>The BoBo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 23:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joetaxpayer.com/?p=1825#comment-8434</guid>
		<description>Well - I&#039;m not going to take each of those points from Elle and break it all down for everyone because that would be an entire post in and of itself.  First, I have been in the healthcare industry on all sides for the last 18 years.  I was a claims processor for an insurance company, a billing manager for a national clinical laboratory, a litigation consultant on qui tam lawsuits for one of the Big 5 firms when there were five, and now I am a compliance officer for the largest primary care group practice in Florida.  Other than the fact that everything Elle stated is completely inaccurate, I would just like to point out that regarding her assertion under #2 - what she suggests regarding physicians overprescribing because they are on commission - in case no one is aware of it - that is illegal.  Not only are the pharmaceutical industries under strict regulations regarding kickbacks - so are the physicians.  There are numerous laws - The Stark Law, The Anti-Kickback law, The PhrMa code, and many many more that I can name.  Physicians are not on commission from the pharmaceutical industry.  They are indeed paid a base salary - and many earn an annual or quarterly bonuses based on various financial incentives - none of which have anything to do with pharmaceuticals.  The pharmacy industry isn&#039;t even allowed to offer rebates or discounts any longer because they have the appearance of being a kickback.  

Anyway - just wanted to put in my two-cents from someone who has been around for a while and actually knows what the Federal and State laws say.  I won&#039;t even get in to her comparison of a single payor plan to the private industry.  She is so far off it&#039;s not even funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well &#8211; I&#8217;m not going to take each of those points from Elle and break it all down for everyone because that would be an entire post in and of itself.  First, I have been in the healthcare industry on all sides for the last 18 years.  I was a claims processor for an insurance company, a billing manager for a national clinical laboratory, a litigation consultant on qui tam lawsuits for one of the Big 5 firms when there were five, and now I am a compliance officer for the largest primary care group practice in Florida.  Other than the fact that everything Elle stated is completely inaccurate, I would just like to point out that regarding her assertion under #2 &#8211; what she suggests regarding physicians overprescribing because they are on commission &#8211; in case no one is aware of it &#8211; that is illegal.  Not only are the pharmaceutical industries under strict regulations regarding kickbacks &#8211; so are the physicians.  There are numerous laws &#8211; The Stark Law, The Anti-Kickback law, The PhrMa code, and many many more that I can name.  Physicians are not on commission from the pharmaceutical industry.  They are indeed paid a base salary &#8211; and many earn an annual or quarterly bonuses based on various financial incentives &#8211; none of which have anything to do with pharmaceuticals.  The pharmacy industry isn&#8217;t even allowed to offer rebates or discounts any longer because they have the appearance of being a kickback.  </p>
<p>Anyway &#8211; just wanted to put in my two-cents from someone who has been around for a while and actually knows what the Federal and State laws say.  I won&#8217;t even get in to her comparison of a single payor plan to the private industry.  She is so far off it&#8217;s not even funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

