Comments on: Partisan Returns http://www.joetaxpayer.com/partisan-returns/ Financial Commentary For The Average Joe Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:56:17 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: mary jo http://www.joetaxpayer.com/partisan-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-1754 mary jo Wed, 22 Oct 2008 22:01:00 +0000 http://www.blog.joetaxpayer.com/?p=633#comment-1754 This is all well and good; however, Presidents very little to do with the economy. This is all well and good; however, Presidents very little to do with the economy.

]]> By: JOE http://www.joetaxpayer.com/partisan-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-1694 JOE Sat, 18 Oct 2008 18:10:52 +0000 http://www.blog.joetaxpayer.com/?p=633#comment-1694 Ooops, english fails me, again. I meant it as;

The word critic comes from the Greek ???????? (kritikós), “able to discern”, which in turn derives from the word ?????? (krités), meaning a person who offers reasoned judgment or analysis, value judgment, interpretation, or observation.

But not as I’d use it to describe my mother;

The term can be used to describe an adherent of a position disagreeing with or opposing the object of criticism.

These two definitions come from wikipedia…
By the way, the comments which agree with me from you or anyone else, are nice to get, but don’t help me learn, unless of course they add extra facts or more data to suppport my opinion.
Joe

]]> By: Augustine http://www.joetaxpayer.com/partisan-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-1693 Augustine Sat, 18 Oct 2008 17:43:15 +0000 http://www.blog.joetaxpayer.com/?p=633#comment-1693 Joe, I like what you write and that's why I subscribe to your blog. It provides me with financial information and insight that I just don't find elsewhere. I don't mean to be a critic for criticism's sake. But when I make a critical comment about an entry it is because I think that you missed or lacked some information which I try to bring to your attention. I appreciate your welcoming my sometimes different perspectives. Your fan. Joe,

I like what you write and that’s why I subscribe to your blog. It provides me with financial information and insight that I just don’t find elsewhere.

I don’t mean to be a critic for criticism’s sake. But when I make a critical comment about an entry it is because I think that you missed or lacked some information which I try to bring to your attention.

I appreciate your welcoming my sometimes different perspectives.

Your fan.

]]> By: JOE http://www.joetaxpayer.com/partisan-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-1681 JOE Fri, 17 Oct 2008 21:31:24 +0000 http://www.blog.joetaxpayer.com/?p=633#comment-1681 You remain my favorite critic. The graphic struck me as interesting and I wanted to pass it along. I did see the 'dividend excluded' warning and didn't have time to analyze whether that would have really shifted the results much. You remain my favorite critic.
The graphic struck me as interesting and I wanted to pass it along. I did see the ‘dividend excluded’ warning and didn’t have time to analyze whether that would have really shifted the results much.

]]> By: Augustine http://www.joetaxpayer.com/partisan-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-1680 Augustine Fri, 17 Oct 2008 21:16:08 +0000 http://www.blog.joetaxpayer.com/?p=633#comment-1680 There are more important things at stake than this cooked up chart. Why were the dividends excluded? Why averaging the returns instead of dollar-averaging? You should know better, Joe. There are more important things at stake than this cooked up chart. Why were the dividends excluded? Why averaging the returns instead of dollar-averaging? You should know better, Joe.

]]> By: Dave Shafer http://www.joetaxpayer.com/partisan-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-1676 Dave Shafer Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:42:41 +0000 http://www.blog.joetaxpayer.com/?p=633#comment-1676 Great charts. I heard this on a liberal talk radio I listen to occasionally. The charts really hit it home. Great charts. I heard this on a liberal talk radio I listen to occasionally. The charts really hit it home.

]]>