<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Roth Roundup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joetaxpayer.com/roth-roundup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joetaxpayer.com/roth-roundup/</link>
	<description>Financial Commentary For The Average Joe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:56:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: V. F.</title>
		<link>http://www.joetaxpayer.com/roth-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-17303</link>
		<dc:creator>V. F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joetaxpayer.com/?p=2513#comment-17303</guid>
		<description>Ed Slott&#039;s advice re the Medicare Premium as I call them &quot;surcharges&quot; as income crosses a threshold level of $85,000 for a single senior or $170,000 is right on the mark.    Keep in mind the Senate-passed healthcare legislation (assumed to be part of Obama&#039;s bill now) would FREEZE THE THRESHOLD LEVELS FROM 2010 through 2019.   Take a look at what your income might have been 10 years ago and add that to what a senior might be withdrawing from IRAs etc. (converting to Roths) and you will find many more seniors caught in a trap of paying &quot;Medicare Part B premium surcharges.&quot;   As Ed Slott indicates based on the income, the premiums or increases might be as much as $6000 per year.

Then add to all of this the benefit of reducing the size of one&#039;s estate (by converting to Roths) if one is unfortunate enough to live in NY where 16% of the income taxable or nontaxable after the first $1 million will hit estates and therefore beneficiaries of those estates --- our sons and daughters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed Slott&#8217;s advice re the Medicare Premium as I call them &#8220;surcharges&#8221; as income crosses a threshold level of $85,000 for a single senior or $170,000 is right on the mark.    Keep in mind the Senate-passed healthcare legislation (assumed to be part of Obama&#8217;s bill now) would FREEZE THE THRESHOLD LEVELS FROM 2010 through 2019.   Take a look at what your income might have been 10 years ago and add that to what a senior might be withdrawing from IRAs etc. (converting to Roths) and you will find many more seniors caught in a trap of paying &#8220;Medicare Part B premium surcharges.&#8221;   As Ed Slott indicates based on the income, the premiums or increases might be as much as $6000 per year.</p>
<p>Then add to all of this the benefit of reducing the size of one&#8217;s estate (by converting to Roths) if one is unfortunate enough to live in NY where 16% of the income taxable or nontaxable after the first $1 million will hit estates and therefore beneficiaries of those estates &#8212; our sons and daughters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daddy Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.joetaxpayer.com/roth-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-15541</link>
		<dc:creator>Daddy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joetaxpayer.com/?p=2513#comment-15541</guid>
		<description>Good read. 
My rules for a Roth do it in a year when your income is down or the market is down. I did it in 2002 and in early March 2009. RYLPX has nearly doubled since the March conversion. Now it is my gain not uncle sams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good read.<br />
My rules for a Roth do it in a year when your income is down or the market is down. I did it in 2002 and in early March 2009. RYLPX has nearly doubled since the March conversion. Now it is my gain not uncle sams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JOE</title>
		<link>http://www.joetaxpayer.com/roth-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-15282</link>
		<dc:creator>JOE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joetaxpayer.com/?p=2513#comment-15282</guid>
		<description>We don&#039;t? I was just getting started. Stay tuned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We don&#8217;t? I was just getting started. Stay tuned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Financial Samurai</title>
		<link>http://www.joetaxpayer.com/roth-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-15279</link>
		<dc:creator>Financial Samurai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joetaxpayer.com/?p=2513#comment-15279</guid>
		<description>Very nice round-up Joe!  I&#039;ve read half of these, and I have to say the discussions we had on my post, largely due to your very thorough commentary were the most interesting!

I&#039;m glad we don&#039;t have to talk about the  ROTH conversion anymore.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice round-up Joe!  I&#8217;ve read half of these, and I have to say the discussions we had on my post, largely due to your very thorough commentary were the most interesting!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad we don&#8217;t have to talk about the  ROTH conversion anymore.  <img src='http://www.joetaxpayer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

