<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Security Benefits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joetaxpayer.com/social-security-benefits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joetaxpayer.com/social-security-benefits/</link>
	<description>Financial Commentary For The Average Joe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:56:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.joetaxpayer.com/social-security-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-30003</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.joetaxpayer.com/?p=150#comment-30003</guid>
		<description>Suggestion for cuts in SS: Like teachers, if you do not put in to Social Security, you should not be able to collect from Social Security, including your spouse&#039;s benefits, unless they are able to show some strong bottom level financial need. It infuriates me that my husband&#039;s benefits, if he were to die before me, would go to someone who chose not to go to work and may have more financial resources (much more from many I have seen) than myself.  It should be fair across the board: No money in, no money out! OR, we should ALL receive our spouse&#039;s benefits that could have been put in a family savings account instead. It seems we would save a lot for those who really need it if we were to change this policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suggestion for cuts in SS: Like teachers, if you do not put in to Social Security, you should not be able to collect from Social Security, including your spouse&#8217;s benefits, unless they are able to show some strong bottom level financial need. It infuriates me that my husband&#8217;s benefits, if he were to die before me, would go to someone who chose not to go to work and may have more financial resources (much more from many I have seen) than myself.  It should be fair across the board: No money in, no money out! OR, we should ALL receive our spouse&#8217;s benefits that could have been put in a family savings account instead. It seems we would save a lot for those who really need it if we were to change this policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

