<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Weekly Roundup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joetaxpayer.com/the-weekly-roundup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joetaxpayer.com/the-weekly-roundup/</link>
	<description>Financial Commentary For The Average Joe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:56:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JOE</title>
		<link>http://www.joetaxpayer.com/the-weekly-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-12766</link>
		<dc:creator>JOE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 01:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joetaxpayer.com/?p=2313#comment-12766</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your note. The community is one of the things I love about blogging. Always good to find a blogger new to you. Dragos is excellent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your note. The community is one of the things I love about blogging. Always good to find a blogger new to you. Dragos is excellent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mizé</title>
		<link>http://www.joetaxpayer.com/the-weekly-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-12763</link>
		<dc:creator>Mizé</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 00:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joetaxpayer.com/?p=2313#comment-12763</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing your weekly roundups, through them I found very interesting blogs I didn&#039;t know before. For example, yesterday I spent the whole night reading Dragos´ self development blog, an excellent reading. 
Regards, Mizé.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing your weekly roundups, through them I found very interesting blogs I didn&#8217;t know before. For example, yesterday I spent the whole night reading Dragos´ self development blog, an excellent reading.<br />
Regards, Mizé.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JOE</title>
		<link>http://www.joetaxpayer.com/the-weekly-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-12654</link>
		<dc:creator>JOE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joetaxpayer.com/?p=2313#comment-12654</guid>
		<description>Technically, FSA money is supposed to used for one&#039;s (or immediate family) own needs. I&#039;d only caution against buying an unusually large ammount of one product, a case of aspirin is certainly a potential to flip a red flag. If you go this route, a small number of many different items shouldn&#039;t get any attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technically, FSA money is supposed to used for one&#8217;s (or immediate family) own needs. I&#8217;d only caution against buying an unusually large ammount of one product, a case of aspirin is certainly a potential to flip a red flag. If you go this route, a small number of many different items shouldn&#8217;t get any attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Augustine</title>
		<link>http://www.joetaxpayer.com/the-weekly-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-12640</link>
		<dc:creator>Augustine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 18:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joetaxpayer.com/?p=2313#comment-12640</guid>
		<description>WRT to FSA with balances, many charities will accept over the counter medication as donation.  So you might put those before-tax dollars to use for a good cause and still get a deduction, a double-whammy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WRT to FSA with balances, many charities will accept over the counter medication as donation.  So you might put those before-tax dollars to use for a good cause and still get a deduction, a double-whammy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Augustine</title>
		<link>http://www.joetaxpayer.com/the-weekly-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-12639</link>
		<dc:creator>Augustine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 18:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joetaxpayer.com/?p=2313#comment-12639</guid>
		<description>Although gold may reach $2000 or even $800, unlike a commenter thought, it&#039;s hard to tell when and it&#039;s ultimately a bet.  While gold is not quite a commodity (since the stock of gold is not used up and remains fairly flat) and is even used as money by central banks and international bank settlements, it&#039;s still traded as any merchandise, when prices may go up or down purely based on the perception of its value, perhaps more so than a regular commodity, whose use determines its value.  In conclusion, nothing is for sure, neither $2000 nor $800, or rather, one should consider both $2000 and $800 as possibilities and act accordingly.  After all, merely months from a bubble having popped, when houses couldn&#039;t but go up, we should have learned the lesson that, yes, gold prices may go down.  For instance, just like the subprime crisis threw gold prices down in a deflationary crash, a similar widespread default could occur next year again when many ARM loans reset, maybe triggering another deflationary event.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although gold may reach $2000 or even $800, unlike a commenter thought, it&#8217;s hard to tell when and it&#8217;s ultimately a bet.  While gold is not quite a commodity (since the stock of gold is not used up and remains fairly flat) and is even used as money by central banks and international bank settlements, it&#8217;s still traded as any merchandise, when prices may go up or down purely based on the perception of its value, perhaps more so than a regular commodity, whose use determines its value.  In conclusion, nothing is for sure, neither $2000 nor $800, or rather, one should consider both $2000 and $800 as possibilities and act accordingly.  After all, merely months from a bubble having popped, when houses couldn&#8217;t but go up, we should have learned the lesson that, yes, gold prices may go down.  For instance, just like the subprime crisis threw gold prices down in a deflationary crash, a similar widespread default could occur next year again when many ARM loans reset, maybe triggering another deflationary event.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kay</title>
		<link>http://www.joetaxpayer.com/the-weekly-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-12637</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 17:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joetaxpayer.com/?p=2313#comment-12637</guid>
		<description>Joe, I&#039;m blushing! Thanks. Kay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe, I&#8217;m blushing! Thanks. Kay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Financial Samurai</title>
		<link>http://www.joetaxpayer.com/the-weekly-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-12635</link>
		<dc:creator>Financial Samurai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 16:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joetaxpayer.com/?p=2313#comment-12635</guid>
		<description>All about the extension to make it permanent and passing it through the Senate.  Fingers crossed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All about the extension to make it permanent and passing it through the Senate.  Fingers crossed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JOE</title>
		<link>http://www.joetaxpayer.com/the-weekly-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-12633</link>
		<dc:creator>JOE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 16:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joetaxpayer.com/?p=2313#comment-12633</guid>
		<description>The law passed extended the rules in place for 2009. $3.5M/person (or $7.0M/couple if you want to look at it that way).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The law passed extended the rules in place for 2009. $3.5M/person (or $7.0M/couple if you want to look at it that way).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JOE</title>
		<link>http://www.joetaxpayer.com/the-weekly-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-12632</link>
		<dc:creator>JOE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 16:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joetaxpayer.com/?p=2313#comment-12632</guid>
		<description>I said it half joking. Recalling the debate when we celebrated 2000 but there was a 2001 group insisting that was the new millennium.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I said it half joking. Recalling the debate when we celebrated 2000 but there was a 2001 group insisting that was the new millennium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Financial Samurai</title>
		<link>http://www.joetaxpayer.com/the-weekly-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-12630</link>
		<dc:creator>Financial Samurai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 15:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joetaxpayer.com/?p=2313#comment-12630</guid>
		<description>I am SO excited the first $7 million for couples will be exempt from taxes.  This seriously is some of the BEST NEWS EVER to come out of this administration!

$3.5 million was pretty fair to begin with, but to raise it to $7 million?  Mama mia awesome!  $7mil is definitely achievable with a lot of hard work and discipline, and a great goal for all of us to achieve.

Go USA!

Sam-urai</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am SO excited the first $7 million for couples will be exempt from taxes.  This seriously is some of the BEST NEWS EVER to come out of this administration!</p>
<p>$3.5 million was pretty fair to begin with, but to raise it to $7 million?  Mama mia awesome!  $7mil is definitely achievable with a lot of hard work and discipline, and a great goal for all of us to achieve.</p>
<p>Go USA!</p>
<p>Sam-urai</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

