≡ Menu

Are you 401(k)o’ed?

Are you depositing money each paycheck to your 401(k) account? Up to the match or even beyond that? Each year, I deposit as much as I can, because even after the match, my plan’s S&P fund charges .05%. Let me spell that out, on $100,000, 1% would be $1000, .05% is $50. The account itself also has an $80 per year fee, so on that same $100,000, the total cost is about .13%. My balance is higher than this, so my cost is lower as an overall percentage.

Recently, I became aware of the 12th edition of the 401(k) averages book. I hate when someone ruins a book or movie’s ending for me. Soylent Green? It’s people. Sorry about that. In this case, I suspect you’re not planning to order the book (for $95) so I’ll not worry too much about ruining the ending. 1.08%. That’s the total cost for the average large retirement plan, over 1000 participants. For a smaller plan, the average costs rise to 1.24%.

Ideally, your 401(k) helps you to take pretax money, otherwise taxed at say, 25%, and delay the withdrawal until retirement, when you plan to be in a lower bracket, 15%, or so you’d hope. You see what’s happening here? Your goal is to save about 10%, a bit more with the effect of the tax-deferred compounding. It doesn’t take long for a 1% or higher fee to negate this savings completely. Say you are about to receive $1333 in pay. You have two choices, to deposit it pretax in the 401(k) or to pay $333 in tax, netting $1000 and invest that in a Roth IRA. After 20 years of growth at say, 8%, the $1333 grows to $6213 in the 401(k), but a 1% fee reduces this to 7%, returning $5158. Ouch. After 15% tax, you have $4385. In the Roth account, the $1000 grows to $4661.

The 1% is just an example, actual fees run as high as over 2%, a cost I consider criminal. Little wonder that Broker-dealers up in arms 401(k) fee disclosure. You see, there’s a new rule scheduled to take place on April 1, 2012. It requires disclosure of the fees within all 401(k) accounts. Only, this April, the joke will be on us, as the average 401(k) account charges such high fees that most participants should stop depositing after the match, and a good number of plan providers in the 1.5% and above should probably be sued for not offering reasonable investment choices.

Most advisors agree that 4% is the amount you can comfortably withdraw each year from your retirement account. When the fees are 1% per year, there’s 3% for you and 1% for the fat cat on Wall Street who sold this plan to your employer. Me, I’d rather switch than get knocked out, unlike the guy in this classic cigarette ad.

{ 9 comments }

A Quiet Sunday Round Up

Another week of Personal Finance blog reading, so with Super Bowl a week away there’s lots of time for another roundup.

First, let’s start with The Car Negotiation Coach’s Auto Industry Trends: 2015 and Beyond Will Be Great for Car Buyers. I like forecasts. Not because I believe the experts all the time, I’m still waiting for my food replicator, after all, but because those who study an industry can often see the trends. In this case, the Coach offers 12 long term trends he sees. I like his prognostication that we’ll be buying cars without having to even go to the card dealer. I also am as hopeful as he is that the Electric Car will become more prevalent.

At Five Cent Nickel, Lisa White wrote Accelerating Your Mortgage Payment. A decent discussion of the bi-weekly mortgage, along with the decision to pre-pay principal each month. I understand the desire to be debt free. No one ever lost sleep knowing their mortgage was paid in full. On the other hand, current mortgage rates are now at record lows. I am now in a 3.5% 15 year fixed rate. Years ago, I’d have bet I’d never live to see a sub-5% mortgage. This also means my after tax cost is 2.5%. With many stocks yielding more than this, the prepaying vs long term investing is one tough decision.

Personal Finance Whiz asks How Much Should I Have Saved for Retirement By Age 30? What I found most interesting was the graph showing the remarkable difference the next 30 years of compounding would bring, ranging from a probably too low 3%, to a high of 12%. It was the difference between $500K and $5.5M. It’s not just about saving, but also getting a decent return.

37 Must-Read Posts for Tax Savings was an excellent resource at Money Spruce. ‘Tis the season, as they say. Tax day isn’t far behind.

Fabulously Broke asked Am I the only one who does this? She used to imagine the things she’d like to buy with that next pay check. Me? I imagine much larger windfalls, tens of millions, but that’s another story.

Last, but most exciting of all, is my refreshed guest post at Don’t Mess With Taxes, titled How your future retirement tax bracket affects today’s Roth IRA decisions. The choice we have each year between investing pre tax in the traditional 401(k) or IRA, vs the Post Tax Roth variants of these accounts isn’t so clear cut. In my guest post at Kay Bell’s site, I go into a deep dive of the numbers. It’s an important decision, choose wisely and you’ll be richer for having done so. Choose wrong, and Uncle Sam will benefit.

{ 6 comments }

Will He Run?

Mitch may make a good candidate after the current crop of hopefuls destroy themselves.

{ 0 comments }

A Wealth Tax? Really?

An article recently appeared in the Wall Street Journal titled “The Conservative Case for a Wealth Tax.” The proposal is to have a fair exemption, say, $3M, and any amount above this would be taxed each year at 3%. The author, Ronald McKinnon offers an example showing that a couple with $5M would be taxed $60K. I imagine many will think this is hardly enough, those hedge fund managers who make million each year can afford to pay more than this. Perhaps, but in the spirit of “Unintended Consequences” I’d suggest that this tax will hurt some people unfairly.

Take a couple who has made a decent income, $150K-$200K, and after selling their home, decides to take their retirement fund, and rent. They have exactly $4M. They don’t trust the stock market to go back to annual returns of 8-10%, and therefore they only withdraw $120K per year. (Remember, this is a retired couple, whatever their profession, let’s just agree they lived well beneath their means to save this money. They paid their taxes, but invested for the long term, much of it pretax.) The seemingly ‘fair’ 3% is $30K of the excess $1M they have. And it’s 25% of their annual budget. If the entire $120K withdrawal is a 401(k) or pretax IRA distribution, they are already planning to pay about $17K in tax, living off the $103K net. This tax would leave them with $73K.

At $5M, the numbers look even worse for this couple. Planning to withdraw $150K gross, and pay closer to $25K in tax, for a net $125K. Now take off $60K for the wealth tax, and they are left with $65K. Uh, right, they socked away an extra million dollars, but this wealth tax leaves them with a lower annual income. “But Joe, the wealth tax can come off the top, not from the withdrawals.” Agreed. but in the 25% bracket, it would take an extra $80,000 withdrawal to net the $60,000 for the $5M couple. They went from a pretty conservative 3% withdrawal target to $230K, a 4.6% rate. Something about this doesn’t seem right. Yet, when you paint a different picture, the 30 year old Wall Street Exec who has already built a $10M retirement account, the tax doesn’t seem so bad.

When it comes to the tax code, it’s very difficult to have a tax that doesn’t hurt those who are not the intended target. It’s easy to make judgments about who has really earned their money. I for one think there are hundreds of bankers involved in the Mortgage Collapse who deserve long jail sentences. The same folk at S&P who decided when you take enough C rated paper and put together, you can get AAA investments are the ones who pulled Uncle Sam’s AAA rating. These are the people who made us all poorer, along with our children who will inherit the national debt. Why these people are still on the streets (I mean employed and not serving time) I don’t know.

What do you think of the wealth tax? Have you seen any articles on it yet?

{ 9 comments }

A Deeper in Debt Round Up

This week really flew by, and it’s time for another roundup. Unlike last week’s all-Suze roundup, this week we’re back to a variety of authors.

Blogger Luke Landes guest posted at Business Insider, a thoughtful article, Yes, There is Such a Thing as Saving Too Much Money. It’s as much about the journey as the destination. Saving to the point you are not happy is certainly saving too much.

New Year resolutions are behind us (you’re keeping up with yours, right?) but Financial Samurai Predictions for 2012 is a great read. 10% on the S&P would be great to see this year.

The Enemy of Debt Brad Chaffee telld us that American Consumers Dive 5.6 Billion Dollars Deeper in Credit Card Debt in One Month. Truth is, this is barely $17 for every person in the US, but it’s accumulated to a $2.5 trillion total. Now you’re talking some real money.

At Beating Broke, advice on how to Save Money by Turning Off Appliances. In a comment, I shared my own experience, an extra computer I left on, till I realized it burned $20 a month in electricity. At 15 cents per kilowatt-hour that’s what a 180W device will cost you.

At The Millionaire Nurse, Dr Dean wrote A Million Bucks? In My 401K? Ya Gotta Be Kiddin’!  No kidding, it’s possible, and takes dedication to putting away as much as you can. The company match helps, of course. Are you maxing out your 401(k) contributions? Are you at least getting the company match?

And to wrap up this week, Len Penzo dot Com’s Roth IRA and Traditional 401(k) Differences – Which Is Better? The biggest missing piece to the puzzle is the not knowing where rates will be in the future or for that matter anything else about the tax structure. This leaves us with a tough decision to make each year.

Another great week of blog reading. Stay warm.

{ 4 comments }